Death Penalty For Drug Trafficking

Death Penalty For Drug TraffickingI reach chosen to focus on the last penalization for medicate trafficking for the sp atomic occur 18-time activity reasons few governments pull up stakes sentence those who atomic number 18 convicted for just the self-control of medicines to the oddment penalization, while early(a) countries are oftentimes lenient and do not do so. From this study, I unavoidableness to know if the enforcement of the shoemakers last punishment whitethorn affect drug trafficking through its deterrence magnetic core.I likewise want to find step to the fore(a) more on the present situation of drug trafficking and thus predict what may happen in the future, with regard to the act and the fair play on drug offences.Death Penalty for Drug Trafficking Is it real obligatory?IntroductionDrug abuse produces long term consequences and problems in societies. Drug trafficking is a serious offence and drug traffickers should be punished. However, shoul d the death punishment be imposed on drug traffickers? Do they deserve the death penalty? Some countries believe implementing the death penalty for drug trafficking has a hindrance effect and would control the drug problem. However, is this really the flake?Which countries enforce the death penalty for drug trafficking? at that place are before long twenty-one countries which express in their laws that those whom are caught trafficking drugs and arrangeting other drug offenses will face the death penalty. From Annex I, it shows that mainly countries in Asia, 18 out of 21, enforce the death penalty for drug trafficking.How does capital of Singapores and Mexicos laws view drug trafficking?Singapore and Mexico were chosen because I want to see the contrast between the laws of a very strict country and one that has a drug contend going on and producing a large hail of drugs.Singapore has strict, redden draconian laws regarding the misuse of drugs and drug trafficking. This is s hown in Singapores laws, under the Misuse of Drugs Act, which state that the trafficking of a certain nitty-gritty of drugs will result in the mostone receiving a mandatory death penalty such as 250 grams of amphetamines and 1,200 grams of opium containing 30 grams of morphine. In addition, any psyche possessing over a certain amount of drugs, such as 15 grams of heroin, 500 grams of pukenabis and 30 grams of cocaine1will be presumed drug trafficking unless ushern otherwise and convicted of the death sentence.2On the other hand, Mexico, a major drug-producing and transit country, has laws which are much more lax than Singapore. Recently, a new law was passed in Mexico that de turnized the simple possession3of drugs. Under this law it is stated that if person is found to possess an amount of drugs under the deductible quantity, they will just be told what are the assertable drug rehabilitation options in their area.4The allowable amounts are 5 grams of hemp and 50 milligrams of heroin, which both contain multiple doses, and 0.5 grams of cocaine. Even if a person is found to be in possession of up to 1,000 times the allowable amounts, he would only be sentenced to 10 months 3 years in prison.5What are the main arguments for and against the usage of the death penalty?This courses us to the have it off of whether using the death penalty is justified for drug trafficking. There are quite a number of factors for hoi polloi to support the death penalty. First, by killing the deplorable, there is one less criminal in parliamentary procedure to do harm, thus offering safety and protection. Secondly, it is a deterrent, as people may not want to take the risk to commit a serious crime if the punishment is death. Supporters say that death penalty has been make as humane as possible and weed be carried out professionally.6The death penalty excessively helps justify the victims death.7However, there are also many factors to oppose using the death penalty fo r drug trafficking. Some religious groups say that life is sacred and killing should not be allowed in any circumstances and death penalty is not pro-life. Also, the botheration of the death penalty is a beastly and unusual punishment8. Opponents also believe that studies of death penalty for deterrence are highly overdraw and arguments in those studies are flawed. In addition, death penalty is always cruel and can never be humane.9In the context of Singapore, opponents of death penalty feel that the usage of the death penalty may result in a higher chance of an innocent person being kill10as Singapore employs a guilty until proven innocent law.11 subsequently considering the arguments from both sides, I am against shocking the death penalty. This is mainly over referable to the fact that there is no confirmed deterrent effect resulting from imposing the death penalty. Though some studies advocate that enforcement of death penalty can deter people from committing crimes12, oth er studies indicated that there is insufficient evidence to prove that death penalty actually has a deterrent effect13. There is really no proof that a person would not commit a crime due to fear of execution. In addition, death penalty is irreversible, so any miscarriages of justice may result in rub consequences as the dead cannot be brought back to life.Does the death penalty for drug trafficking have a deterrent effect on criminals?There is petty(a) information regarding whether the death penalty for drug trafficking has an actual deterrent effect on criminals in Singapore. However, I have created a line graphical record showing a comparison of the number of drug related executions and the pith number of drug abusers arrested in Singapore.Fig. 1 Number of drug-related executions14in affinity to the total number of drug abusers arrested in Singapore in hundreds15From Fig. 1 above, it is shown that there is no correlation between the number of drug-related executions and the total number of drug abusers arrested in Singapore. There have been some instances where there has been some correlation though, from the year 1994 to 1997 both the numbers of drug-related executions and drug abusers dropped, albeit at polar rates. Also, from 2000 to 2001, both numbers rose. However, this does not prove that there is a deterrent effect for the death penalty as the number of drug abusers should attach when the number of drug related executions drop.There are probably other factors affecting the number of drug abusers and drug-related executions such as the effectiveness of the criminal justice system, demographic changes and economic conditions. With a more effective criminal justice system, there could be more executions regardless of whether there is an outgrowth or decrease in the number of drug abusers. Changing demographics could lead to more drug abusers if the change involved an increase in young population between the ages of 13 to below 30. This however, may not unavoidably lead to more executions though one would think that more drug abusers could lead to an increase in drug trafficking. There is just no simple correlation among these factors.When economic conditions are bad, the number of drug abusers may increase as people abuse drugs to relieve their unhappiness.16However, there may be less executions, since costs required for executing a person is quite high, over USD$1 million as a mend is needed to be employed to certify the criminals death17.Is the death penalty really necessary?What would happen if all countries currently practising the death penalty abolish it in the next 20 years? With increasing drive from Amnesty International and an ever increasing opposition to the death penalty, governments of countries would be under increasing pressure to abolish death penalty due to drug trafficking. In my opinion, the abolishment of death penalty may not lead to a surge of drug trafficking as drug trafficking is affected mor e by the demand for drugs than the fear of the death penalty. Also, there are other alternatives such as life imprisonment without parole.Also, what would happen to the smart set if the death penalty was abolished? As mentioned above, the abolition of the death penalty can occur due to pressure from Amnesty International and other organisations. I believe that society in general would not be much affected as there has not been any proof that death penalty acts as a deterrent. Hence, drug trafficking would not be greatly increased. Pro-life members of the society would welcome the abolishment while the supporters of death penalty would put pressure on the government to step up law enforcement to prevent increased drug trade and use.From the previous two scenarios, I conclude that imposing the death penalty for drug trafficking is not necessary because drug trafficking will not increase when the death penalty is abolished as there is no deterrent effect and it may help with tighten l aw enforcement on drug trafficking and abuse.Word Count 1475