Macbeth Was Not Totally Responsible For The Evil Unleashed In Scotland :: essays research papers

Macbeth Was Not Totally Responsible For the Evil Unleashed In ScotlandMacbeth, al kilobytegh largely responsible, was not totally responsible for the flood lamp of evil which was unleashed in Scotland after after Duncans death.Both noblewoman Macbeth and the supernatural powers must accept at last some of theresponsibility for the evil works unleashed during Macbeth reign. They bothforced Macbeth to be proactive in chasing the crown at a time when he was of theopinion that " If chance may have me might why chance may crown me."The play began with the forces of evil stirring Macbeths ambitions nature bydeclaring that he " shall b king thereafter." They then said of thou be none."Banquo noted how Macbeth looked fearful and he must have realised the witchesput into words what Macbeth had been thinking. The supernatural forces not onlygot Macbeth thinking about how he could become king but also laid thefoundations for his feelings of insecurity that would lead to h is subsequentmurder of Banquo.The major external influence pushing Macbeth to kill Duncan was Lady Macbeth.She knew her husband was " too full o the milk of human kindness" to puddle theinitiative and she resolved to push him into murdering Duncan Macbeth was soupset after killing Duncan he stated " Ill go no more,I am afraid to think what I have done". Lady Macbeth then accepted theresponsibility of victorious the daggers and smearing the grooms with blood. She hadgoaded Macbeth into killing Duncan and she stopped him from falling apart withremorse after having done the deed.Macbeths reign as king was one of fear and insecurity that others would take thecrown from him. Of Banquo he said " their is none but he whose being I do fear".Macbeth was obviously thinking back to the prophesies of the witches and he