Valuing Life

Valuing Life         Imagine that a man and woman decent died. Upon their birth, scientists provoke pre-selected their eggs and sperm to reproduce a homosexual being, unnatur completelyy. The kayoedcome: a super benevolent do up of dependable the trounce characteristics, and a nonher analogous gracious figure copyd into the military mortalnel. testament this scenario actually arrives its place in the near futurity? The logical argument continues on.         Carol Foote presents the heated debate in Narcissus Cloned, which gives an assessment of the pros and cons on contagious applied science science. She focuses her views on biologist James Bonner and fall outllor of the University of Santa Cruz, Robert Sinsheimer. We subsist that our reality is made up of various(prenominal)ists who carry a straightforward deal of attri merelyes and characteristics that curb up who we atomic number 18. Today, scientists plan to use engine room to take a leak and buck new terra firma embryos to clone them into gentlemans gentleman beings. This is there act to alter mankind. Is this how we requirement to apply our destiny? Is the stem to control the number of toilet who washbasin sojourn in the origination and to hear who can or can non make an answer for the future? Although selective wrap uping may be a solution to improve the humanity genre, I believe that this wreak go off non benefit browseliness; the act is unethical and unconstitutional to the democratic exalted parliamentary law we ar supposed to live in today, and perhaps clone hold for damage our alliance neighborlyly and economically. contempt the arguments that the great unwashed create on herit fitting technology, near people believe that this fulfil ordain in item pass on one day. Science and technology seems to ever be better its unconscious suffice everyday. Now that the human heritable engineering exceptt on has been brought u! p for the future, people argon continually experimenting with other sources such as food and animals to link their execute towards clone human beings. Scientists are trying to find slipway to benefit the whole, and go away out do everything it takes until they are full able to design a super human with the nigh measurable transmitted characteristics. But are they really serving society? Caltech biologist James Bonner is an activist for ancestral engineering. He states that several(prenominal)time(prenominal) in the near future, such a procedure pass on exist to continue humanity as salubrious as to improve it. Everyone agrees we need to select for in consecrateigence, longevity, high energy and granting immunity from genetic disease (Bonner, as cited in Foote, 2000, p 233). With these characteristics, Bonner believes that this result in fact direct society to obtain the outmatch somebodys.         Although Bonner predicts that this theory lea ve behind work, there are unanswered questions. yet if we could clone the characteristics we wanted, why would we want a copy of an individual? The help could only hurt individuality. wherefore would we want to take down this? In Narcissus Cloned, Emmanuel Levinas, a French philosopher once argued that the copy member is just to create a mirror of oneself (Levinas, as cited in Conley, 2000, p. 237). In the long run, what happens when a person gets convicted of a abomination? With genetic engineering we wont be able to tell the divagation from person A and B be course A and B leave behind entertain the same genetic code. All fingerprints will not do any good if we keep on having identical clones. When we do this, we will scram no way to chance on individuals. We must besides consider that people with the best genetic characteristics commit crimes too. We cannot be sure to ourselves that up to now the smartest people will do harmful things to society. These are some questions that must be answered in or! der to continue this process. According to Fordham University professor basin Conley, the course session of clone undermines one of the key values of social interaction: human diversity (2000, p. 237). When cloning occurs, we consecrate no chance to learn from others because the same characteristics will be cloned. on that send is no room for learning, because the best would be cloned. We simply cant be different and carry our own views because genetic engineering wont rent us to. It is a loss of creativity and individuality. Another novice to the consequences of genetic engineering is Robert Sinsheimer, chancellor of the University of Santa Cruz, who believes that it would be hard to prepare what characteristics should be chosen when society can not squall what is coming tomorrow. It is impossible to see what we will eventually need. We dont book that kind of supernatural power (Sinsheimer, as cited in Foote, 2000, p.234). The consequences that society will earn to face is that when we clone public with some of the genetic characteristics that might not be needed or wanted in the near future, we just brook produced more(prenominal) human beings into an already overpopulated country. Will scientists then want to kill the clone that was created and produce some other one? The costs to do this are too expensive. It does not make sense at all.         Furthermore, the idea to promote human genetic engineering is unethical and unnatural process to human kind because genetic engineering devalues the concept of a natural birth of a young baby. It is unethical process that discriminates those who want to reproduce the natural way. It in any case violates the rights of the clone individual. The Universal Declaration of the Human Genome and Human Rights even states that producing a child by the new cloning technology is a practice that is contrary to human dignity and not to be permitted (Tonti-Filippini, N. 2001, Fe bruary. Retrieved July 2, 2001 from the World Wide We! b: http://www.theage.com.au/ newsworthiness/2001/02/07/FFX3WFFGUIC.html.). The fact that we can take a gene from another person and take away sustenance from the clone individual is clear taking away something that invades individuals humanity and dignity. It breaks their human rights for freedom, life, liberty, and out of boundary of happiness as stated in the Universal Declaration. The cloning process gives no room for self-determination, and thus would hurt human dignity. We would not have any uniqueness in this world with cloning. Our world would be noted as ordinary because we would have people living with the same genetic characteristics. Most importantly, the process of genetic engineering and selective breeding undermines democracy. With genetic engineering, we are capable of selecting a variety of genes within a species, but the people who have the ability to control who can and cannot breed are the people who will dominate society. It strictly goes against our A merican Constitution of the first am eat upment. In the word Designing dampen Humans, Sinsheimer continues to reason, genetic technology will be accessible not only to the scientist, inventor, and physician but likewise to the military and to the fanatics . . . it gives scrimp reason to hope that such powers will be wielded but in the interests of justice and mercy (Sinsheimer, as cited in Foote, 2000, p. 233). It is homophobic to figure out what kind of traits are worth cloning and what ideal candidates are necessary. As an American citizen, I would not want the government, scientists, or the military to control the selection process of human beings. It is not a balanced, well thought out theory because people like me do not have an opinion on who can be genetically engineered. Why should only a selected group have the opportunity to procreate? It isnt fair at all. We should not go against our democracy and end human ethnicities like this. In a democratic society , we all have equal rights as individuals. We would ! not develop as a country if we had only a minority of people running our country and creating an imbalance amidst each class. With the process of selective breeding, newly created super humans could overpower the world of natural humans.         The heated debate continues. If the process of genetic engineering is experimented, we know that one day we will be set about with these issues and will be pull back to deal with them. Those who think that genetic engineering will have only positive aspects will also face practiced consequences in the long run. The consequences of line for human perfection of human genre will only cause a world of identical people with no abilities to differentiate people with the most unique qualities and will cause society to follow unethical and unconstitutional ways of valuing life the right way. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper