Police Corruption Problems

Corruption has been in the dark closets of Ameri cornerstone policing since it was first launch in the country. When policing was first instituted conditions were not the best, pay was low, and respect was hard to find. These problems conjugate with the problem of a lack of laws in which bound the legal philosophy to get to a specific task a specific way, meant they had enough prudence to hang themselves by. There shouldnt be any surprise that subversive activity hasnt vanished and encorporate trust most deally never totally go away. It is in force(p) like the saying Absolute power, go bads absolutely.It is just gracious nature to want a better life and get the things you everlastingly wanted. Some slew, and police atomic number 18 just people, just stooget resist the temptation for easy m 1y. People have a way of rationalizing posts in their heads, by thinking they are just victorious care of their families and paying there bills. This is similar to the job I shortl y have, working in the Asset protection department for Sears. I crack things I would like to have all solar day long, I be intimate I could take them and no one would ever know, but I dont.I dont do it beca commit there is a fear of getting caught or any kind of punishment like that, I dont do it because of ethics and morals. I, like the bulk of people see the chance, while a very small percent of people take advantage of it. It is the same with policing most police are honest and hard working but, there are always rough bad apples in the bunch. If you knew a way to tell if someone was firing to be honest in eachthing they do, 100% of the time, I think you would at the very least be a billionaire. Corruption has to be specify in order to look at it closer.The dictionary definition of subversive activity is 1. Marked by immorality and perversion depraved. 2. Venal dishonest a corrupt mayor. 3 Containing errors or alterations, as a text a corrupt translation. 4. Archaic. Tai nted putrid. Would consider a police ships officer who authentic a free cup of coffee corrupt?. What about an officer accepting money in exchange for not patrolling his/her sector. What would you think of a business person taking that same cup of coffee, would you believe him/her to be corrupt? I think you have to draw a identify on what is corrupt and what you believe isnt.I think you have to add into your last making steps the off displaceers jobs, position, and role in the community. The conclusion I came to is that it definitely does make a difference on the job, position, and role in the community. I believe if the business person had nothing to do with the stick in which he/she received the coffee, he/she is not corrupt. He/she just had an act of kindness betrothed on them. Regarding the police officer, he/she should not of authentic the coffee because he/she has a duty to stay impartial to the community.If he/she had to go to a fight later that same day between the p erson that gave him the coffee and another person, and the person who gave him the coffee was prove to be in the right and the other person was in the wrong, what would find out? Most probably the person who was arrested (assuming this person had knowledge that he accepted the coffee) would most likely bring that fact up at the trial. If this situation happened the officers integrity would be in question, and the jury/ assay would have to wonder about it.Of course accepting coffee is not the main focus of police subversion, its not a draw inst the law, nor depart it have a overwhelming impact on policing. I do believe the representative puts into simplistic terms the larger problems which are occurring with policing in large. It all rise ups conquer to Do I take it or dont I take it? and it is enough? Corruption is like a drug in a way, you start small and just work your way up the ladder, until you fall off. I verbalise before that accepting a cup of coffee isnt against th e law and doesnt make up the corruption which we face today.I am going to describe some novel corruption cases which have been fought. As identified in a paper by the Knapp Commission published over two decades ago it was frame there are two different violators. The first are called union eaters who abundantly misuse their power for personal gain. These individuals go out and undertake ways to get money and have the advantage. The second type is called the wood pussy eaters these people are the ones who just accept payoffs and such when the happenstance develop their way.For the most part, when you hear of a corruption case you most likely hear about the Meat eaters, because they are the ones which get bolder faster with every successful gain. So what do we do about it? I said before if punishment isnt going to stop police from sightly corrupt, what allow for? The first step to solving this disease, which is slowly consume away at public trust, is to acknowledge the proble m. Managers on a solely use three different cominges when failing to deal with corruption. First, it is simply cut down the problem like it was never there.This approach is bad for many reasons. If the police cant police themselves, someone go out have to come in and do it for them. Public trust will never be gained. The second approach is a pollyanna mentality. This is where the manager discovers and finds the corruption, but downplays its total impact. This approach as with the first approach, will cause someone outside the mental representation to solve the problem. The third is the most lethal approach for the manager to take, one of a cover-up. Like the second, the manager discovers the corruption, but takes overt follow through to cover it up.Not only did the manager condone this behavior, but this will only lead to more corruption and abuse. This now enlarged corruption, will eventually lead to great public mistrust. A manager can overcome the problems with these approa ches by assuming a realistic posture to this issue. This will allow the effects of the corruption to be less damaging to the delegacy. The next step to prevent corruption is to develop a plan of action. temporary hookup no one plan will be foolproof it should allow in these three elements, military recruitment, teach, and investigation.As I previously stated, you have to come up with a definition of corruption to be used for your plans. I fire everything from accepting a cup of coffee to the further most end of the spectrum be included. Using this definition stops people and managers from trying to get back what is across the line and what isnt. If you try to draw a line this can create confusion and many people could rationalize situations as existence OK. The International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) defines corruption as acts involving the misuse of government agency by a police officer in a dash designed to produce either personal gain or gain for others.Wi th a definition like this everyone from the patrol officer to the Chief knows where they stand. The IACP created the computer simulation for Management Corruption Prevention, in reaction to the corruption running speedy in the departments. This model covers the three basic elements which I mentioned previously recruitment, reading, and investigation. recruitment is the first step in this process. It goes without saying that no agency hires people who they know are corrupt. There are a multitude of reasons why agencies should Weed out bad recruits. Money is at the top of the list. each(prenominal) the training in which the recruit has to go through cost the taxpayers a lot of money. Many agencies have policies in which they hire only apt personnel so this cost can be eliminated. Selecting candidates which have already been on the job, shows supervisors a track record and therefor gives them more information. The use of the polygraph is a useful tool when weeding out candidates.. Training provides outstanding opportunity to make a anti-corruption plan work. It does this for a couple reasons. First training gets the message out with concern to standards.Second, this training allows the recruit to ask questions and to straighten out his doubts about what is appropriate and what isnt. Training is divided into two parts, recruit and in-service. The in-service training is a valuable tools because the recruit interacts with a seasoned officer and allows that recruit to ask questions about everyday events. The department must also fascinate the candidate for a probationary period of about six months. This programs is called the field of view Training Officer (FTO) period. During this period of FTO the new recruit rides with a seasoned officer.Most agencies can release the recruit during this period for smallish or no cause. The department may also elect to beam their recruits to a formal academic setting for training. This in turn will hopefully help the recru it in making the right decision when the question arises Will I take it or wont I? . The last stage of this three point training is investigation. This is the polar elements to this whole program, without it everything else loses its ability to function. If the public knows the department will thoroughly canvass all reports of corruption, it will instill a confidence with the department.The investigation phase will most likely be conducted by the departments internal personal matters unit. The IACP developed a model for departments to utilize. The first issue to be communicate is staffing. In small departments this could lie down of only one person on a part time basis. In larger departments this unit could consist on many officers on a full time basis. If you are really concerned with the corruption within your department, you should consider having an outside agency investigate alleged corruption. This will ensure favoritism will not occur.Once you have decided with type of staffing is appropriate for your department, you should decide where in the department to place them. The best location for the unit to be is straightaway under the Chief. This will provide for a direct line of chat of the problems at hand. The Chief should provide a clear and definitive operation for investigating alleged allegations of corruption.Theses procedures may include 1. Handling all complaints pronto and impartially. 2. Explanation that the unit only handles facts, and doesnt determine guilt of innocents. 3. meticulous and accurate documentation is a must. 4. Responding to a crime scene instantaneously where an officer had to shoot a subject.In summary, police are tender-hearted and have the same compulsions which others posses. This of course doesnt excuse the corruption in the departments. When you think of corruption in the police field, remember that acts which are corrupt for one may not be corrupt for all. Every precedent needs to be looked in to with great concern and objectiveness. If we dont investigate every allegation we will loose the public trust and this will make it impossible to do the job effectively.